<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Usage vs. Users: Facebook&#8217;s Smart Experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.evernote.com/opportunitynotes/2012/12/04/usage-vs-users-facebooks-smart-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.evernote.com/opportunitynotes/2012/12/04/usage-vs-users-facebooks-smart-experiment/</link>
	<description>By Rafe Needleman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 18:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirkhutson</title>
		<link>http://blog.evernote.com/opportunitynotes/2012/12/04/usage-vs-users-facebooks-smart-experiment/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>kirkhutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 02:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evernote.com/opportunitynotes/?p=739#comment-178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good thoughts. I personally don&#039;t mind signing up on apps through Facebook Connect, and it seems to work well, as long as it&#039;s fast, and I can easily have it not post for me. (It would be best if it doesn&#039;t even try. I have been known to balk at that point.) Do you think maybe the non-sign in option for oversees is due to people being identified through sign-ins, and doing it with an instant alias would better protect them from oppressive governments or those who would do them harm? I wouldn&#039;t sign in to Facebook if it killed me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts. I personally don&#8217;t mind signing up on apps through Facebook Connect, and it seems to work well, as long as it&#8217;s fast, and I can easily have it not post for me. (It would be best if it doesn&#8217;t even try. I have been known to balk at that point.) Do you think maybe the non-sign in option for oversees is due to people being identified through sign-ins, and doing it with an instant alias would better protect them from oppressive governments or those who would do them harm? I wouldn&#8217;t sign in to Facebook if it killed me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roschler</title>
		<link>http://blog.evernote.com/opportunitynotes/2012/12/04/usage-vs-users-facebooks-smart-experiment/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>roschler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evernote.com/opportunitynotes/?p=739#comment-177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; Which do you want more: Users? Or use?



There&#039;s a question that will get a greater variety of answers then the blind men and the elephant!  (Pachyderm pun on purpose).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Which do you want more: Users? Or use?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a question that will get a greater variety of answers then the blind men and the elephant!  (Pachyderm pun on purpose).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
